How technology is remaking our world, for better or worse

How technology is remaking our world, for better or worse

It can be a dangerous time for mom nature – yet there’s no point in trying to rewind the clock. As an alternative, why not flip the clock forward?

This is what Nathaniel Rich describes for the sick environment in “Second Nature: Scenes from a World Remade.” And he gives pointers to aid in his analysis.

One set of indications is the spread of pollution around the world, along with a class of synthetic chemical substances called PFAS. Nearly every American has been exposed to PFAS, which are used in nonstick cookware as well as water-repellent and stain-resistant products.

An infamous case of PFAS water contamination and its health consequences in West Virginia became the main focus of a story Rich wrote for the New York Times, and that story influenced a 2019 film titled “Dark Waters.”

The opening chapter of “Second Nature” revisits the “Darkish Waters” saga, although Wealth has pioneered the various methods during which human influence through air pollution and local climate change, as well as genetic engineering and land development. changing nature. The impacts could lead to the kinds of glaciers disappearing on Mount Rainier – or disintegrating sea stars in Pacific coastal waters along Puget Sound.

“It’s not that interference within the pure world is new,” Wealth said. “We’ve been doing this from the get-go. What’s new is, I think, we’re finally coming to an end as a society and individually with incredible depth and scope for intervention, with the aim that .. Nothing truly pure within the pure world can be discovered by any standard definition of the time period.”

Rich is due to focus on the environment around the world, and the methods researchers and conservationists are developing to handle these diseases, following a live-streamed Town Hall Seattle presentation next week. To set the stage, Wealth explored the theme of “Second Nature” within the latest episode of the Fiction Science podcast, science coming to you from the intersection of truth and fiction.

This isn’t the first time that Wealth, the son of longtime New York Instance columnist Frank Wealth, has chronicled environmental development. In “Losing Earth”, Amir digs into the historical past of the local weather debate and argues that marketing campaigns to foreshadow the disaster date back to the eighties.

Wealth’s journal article, which was later expanded into a book, sparked an argument among local weather campaigners. Penn State climatologist Michael Mann, himself no stranger to controversy, has complained that Wealth’s message “removes accountability from fossil gasoline searches and their instigators.”

In response, Wealth insisted it was not apologetic to the polluters. He agrees with Mann that addressing the local weather disaster will be the main problem for the next era – though adds that it is necessary to observe why efforts from the previous era quickly fell through.

“I don’t think we’re going to be able to have an important conversation about how we’re going to move forward if we deny some of our failures before the situation got so complicated,” he said. said.

One big thing that has changed since the eighties is that some business leaders, including Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, are investing billions of dollars to fix local weather problems.

“As with every little thing related to local weather changes, we all want the most from people, right?” Said rich. “If billionaires are going to make local weather a part of their agenda, well.”

Wealth devoted a chapter of his guide to the climate debate that has been raging among the ultra-rich in Aspen: On one hand, a warm local weather could tip the snow-capped ski slopes of Aspen and additional wilderness in Colorado. Can whip the fire of . Again, curbing electricity use and managing land in an environmentally conscious approach can conflict with the lives of the wealthy and famous.

“There’s a lot of irony out there,” Wealthy said—and people make for an attention-grabbing study in irony “second nature.”

“They are speaking about creating new man-made species in a laboratory that can fulfill the same ecological region of interest as the species we have killed,” Amir said. “I think it’s fascinating, and there’s one thing that clearly strikes you as the craziest, or disturbing type, at first encounter with it.”

However the wealthy are beginning to believe that “there is a technique to madness.”

“We now have to get more used to this concept of directed intervention – which, despite everything, has been with us since the beginning of conservation,” he said. “Perhaps most traditional conservationists nonetheless discuss ‘land administration’, which is basically another euphemism for controlling the conditions of an ecosystem.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *